Toxic Trade News / 8 May 2009
< Previous Page
Scores die breaking down ships in Asia
by The Associated Press
8 May 2009 (Singapore) – When it comes to jobs that workers in rich Western countries don't want, there are few more dirty and dangerous than scrapping the world's freighters, luxury liners and oil tankers.

Explosions and fires kill scores of poorly equipped workers each year in South Asia where most ships are broken apart. The region's beaches are littered with rusting vessels, staining the sands with oils and other chemicals.

But companies are under growing pressure to protect workers and the environment.

Governments will meet Monday in Hong Kong to consider approving the International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, which aims to make the industry safer and greener.

During the five day meeting, countries are expected to agree on measures that require new ships to limit the amounts of hazardous materials they're built with and require older ships to be broken down in yards that meet certain environmental standards.

The convention is also expected to require recycling facilities to put in place measures that reduce explosions and other accidents as well ensuring workers are properly trained and provided with safety equipment such as gloves, goggles and face masks.

"The conditions need improving. You need more training. You need workers protected," said Nikos Mikelis, a ship breaking expert for the International Maritime Organization which developed the draft convention.

Still, environmentalists and human rights organizations argue the convention falls far short of what is needed to reform the much-maligned industry. They're worried it lacks enough teeth to enforce the standards it's trying to set.

Ship breaking, like other industries in an age of globalization, migrated several decades ago from the West to the developing world. The shipping industry estimates up to 1,000 ships are broken down each year mostly in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan and to a lesser degree China and Turkey.

The industry shifted away from shipping yards in the industrial world because many of the older ships ­ some as tall as 15-stories and several football fields long ­ are full of dangerous materials such as asbestos that wouldn't meet health standards. It is also more profitable and requires less red tape to sell a ship for recycling in the developing world.

But with the boom in the trade has also come dangers. Greenpeace and other environmental groups have estimated that 50 to 60 workers die each year in the ship yards of India and Bangladesh. Hundreds more are injured or sickened from contamination to toxins like asbestos, mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls, they say.

Environmental groups, along with some European countries, seized on the deaths to call for reforms in South Asian yards and their efforts have begun paying off.

The French aircraft carrier Clemenceau was originally set to be dismantled in India, but revelations that it was loaded with asbestos sparked protests by environmental groups there. As a result, it traveled to Britain in February where it is being broken down at a yard specializing in hazardous materials.

Meanwhile, the European Union has called for better procedures and checks on ships sent to South Asian yards in the wake of the Clemenceau debacle and expectations that as many as 800 single-hulled tankers in Europe will be phased out by 2015 in favor of safer, double-hulled ships.

Asian courts, too, have stepped in. They're requiring ship yards in Bangladesh and India to clean up their acts or face closure. Indian yards have implemented tougher environmental standards following orders from the country's Supreme Court while a court ruling requiring all yards in Bangladesh to get environmental clearance has been appealed.

For supporters of the proposed convention like the International Chamber of Shipping and the Ship Recycling Association of India, it simply reaffirms the direction the industry is already heading.

Yet critics of the draft convention say it has no effective measures to enforce the standards, provides no assistance for cash-strapped governments to upgrade facilities and fails to hold ship owners in the West responsible for removing and treating hazardous waste from their vessels.

It also fails to ban beaching, an environmentally hazardous practice in which ships are driven onto the shoreline where they are then broken down. It is commonplace in South Asia.

The convention is a "major step back from existing environmental principles," said Ingvild Jenssen of the NGO Platform on Shipbreaking ­ a Brussels-based group of 14 environmental and human rights organizations. "It pushes the responsibility to handle hazardous materials downstream to developing countries."

Opposition from environmental groups is unlikely to sink the convention and most delegates expected it to be ratified.

But there remain questions as to whether all the recycling countries will come on board. Bangladesh, for one, has called for funding to meet the convention's requirements.

FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The Basel Action Network is making this article available in our efforts to advance understanding of ecological sustainability and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

More News
< Previous Page Return to Top
©2011 Basel Action Network (BAN). All Rights Reserved. – Phone: 206-652-5555 | FAX: 206-652-5750

Select images courtesy of Chris Jordan