space Press Releases, News Stories

VICTORY FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE:

TOXIC WASTE DUMPED ON CAMBODIA WILL FINALLY BE TREATED BY PRODUCER

BAN Press Release


SEATTLE, USA, 9 June 2000 -- In what community and environmental justice activists hail as a precedent setting victory, the Formosa Plastics Group (FPG) has finally come to terms with local residents to process by retort technology, purchased from the United States, 4,400 tonnes of mercury contaminated industrial waste at their corporate site in Jenwu Township in Kaohisung County, Taiwan. The residents will allow the processing to take place in exchange for compensation of NT$15 million (489,000 US $) to Jenwu township which will be used for local infrastructure and to hire experts to monitor FPG's treatment of the waste. In addition, FPG said it would offer a guarantee in the form of a NT$100 million (3,263,000 US $) check made out to the township to ensure that the company finishes the treatment job within eight months without producing any pollution.

The demand that FPG take responsibility for its own waste at its corporate site in Taiwan rather than export their problems, was called for by environmentalists around the world following FPG's infamous and scandalous export of the waste to the impoverished and war-torn country of Cambodia. The illegal Cambodian dumping led to the deaths of 7 persons.

Following that crisis, FPG then attempted to re-export the mercury waste to a dumpsite near a Latino community in Southern California, then to a desert dumpsite in Nevada, next to a remote dump in Idaho, to a waste disposal facility near a small town in France, a disposal firm in Germany, and once again to Nevada. In every case, citizen action, caused the wastes disposal plans or contracts to be rejected forcing FPG to finally accede to environmentalist demands.

"A lesson has been taught and hopefully one has been learned in this case," said Jim Puckett, Coordinator of the Basel Action Network (BAN) which organized the coalition victory. "The export and dumping of hazardous waste to avoid waste prevention and responsibility at source will not be tolerated. Ignore that fact and industries will pay far more for allowing the wastes to move downstream than for preventing them upstream."

The BAN spokesperson noted that the company never compensated any of the Cambodians that lost their lives and suffered property damage due to the dumping. The company also remains culpable and unpunished for contaminating vast tracts of Taiwan by its past dumping practices. FPG is the world's largest producer of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic. The manufacture of PVC creates numerous hazardous wastes including the most infamous pollutant -- dioxin.

BAN affiliate groups called for vigilance with respect to monitoring whether the technology FPG purchased from the United States is the best available and not an outdated technology available at a cheaper price.

"FPG has finally taken a step in the right direction, said Lily Hsueh of the Taiwan Environmental Action Network (TEAN). However, it is critical that we continue to closely monitor them in this process, work to ensure that they continually reduce their hazardous waste, and further to press them to commit to ceasing altogether the manufacture of PVC."

For more information contact:

Jim Puckett, Basel Action Network (BAN) in Seattle: 1-206-720-6426

Lily Hsueh, Taiwan Environmental Action Network (TEAN) in London: 44-207- 424-6005

 

 

Chronology of Formosa Plastics Group Dumping Scandal

 

November 20, 1998: Formosa Plastics Group (FPG), frustrated at not getting permission to dump ships 3,000 tonnes of mercury laced toxic industrial waste in a local landfill, pays a broker to ship the waste off to Cambodia without any permit for such export.

November 30, 1998: The waste arrives at Sihanoukville port in Cambodia in large sacks labeled polyester chip. The shipping papers call the waste "cement cake".

December 2, 1998: The Kaohsiung branch of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration discovers that the waste is missing.

December 4, 1998: The waste is trucked and the large bags are dumped on unused land near Sihanoukville. Villagers immediately begin scavenging the plastic bags using them for mats and tarpaulins.

December 19, 1998: First reports appear on two deaths associated with those handling the waste and public rioting ensues. One was a worker that helped unload the ship hold carrying the waste. The second was a youth that slept on one of the mats. Peaceful Protests against the dumping take place.

December 20, 1998: Thousands of residents and dockworkers attacked customs offices and the offices of the economic police in Cambodia's main seaport in protest. One individual was killed in the rioting when he fell from an upper story in the ransacked building. 7 persons are arrested. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen demanded that the 3,000 tonnes of industrial waste be sent back home immediately. He appealed for help from the United Nations, World Health Organization and relevant environmental agencies in resolving the matter. The head of the local importing company is arrested by Cambodian authorities.

December 21, 1998: Rumors of the combined impacts of the toxicity and falling rains, creates a mass panic and exodus as 10,000 people flee Sihanoukville leaving the town completely empty. 4 persons die in traffic accidents as a result of the panic. 3 more persons are arrested for rioting including 2 human rights workers that were monitoring the protest.

December 22, 1998: Taipei officials urged Phnom Penh to mount an inquiry, calling it ''irrational'' to blame Taiwan without sufficient evidence. Formosa Plastics Group stated that the waste was not hazardous and could legally be land filled in Taiwan. The Cambodian Army is called in to shovel all of the waste and contaminated soil into plastic lined used "oil" drums. Many of the workers remove their protective clothing due to hot weather.

December 24, 1998: First sample results come in from Singapore and show 675 parts per million (ppm) of mercury. A mercury expert called in by the World Health Organization (WHO) from the Minimata Institute called the levels very high. He said the waste posed a long-term health hazard and should be removed.

December 28, 1998: The Taiwan government offers to assist Cambodia in the inquiry into the dumping scandal and urged FPG to return the waste.

January 1, 1999: FPG agrees to return the waste but does not agree to pay compensation. The Basel Action Network called on Taiwan, Cambodia and all other governments that had not yet done so to ratify the Basel Convention waste trade ban.

January 3, 1999: FPG announces that they will ship the waste to the United States or Europe for disposal.

January 9, 1999: WHO organization representative in Cambodia states that the waste mercury does not pose a health threat.

January 15-19, 1999: Representatives of BAN and Greenpeace arrive in Cambodia, visit the site, meet with high level officials and together with Legal Aid of Cambodia and the NGO Forum on Cambodia, hold a press conference demanding return of the wastes, adequate testing, and full ratification of international waste trade ban. They also reveal newly acquired documents showing mercury levels in the waste as high as 10,971 ppm (over 1%).

February 15, 1999: Three Cambodian customs officials were indicted for their involvement in importing the toxic waste.

February 25, 1999: Cambodia signs agreement with FPG, that FPG would take the responsibility for repacking, sites cleanup and transportation of the waste out of Cambodia. They agreed to remove the toxic waste from Sihanoukville within 60 days or be fined 1,000 U.S. dollars a day for the first 15 days beyond the 60-day deadline. No compensation was to be paid to victims without medical proof agreed by both sides. BAN and Legal Aid of Cambodia call it "getting away with murder".

March 12, 1999: FPG repackages the waste and signs a deal with US disposal firm Safety-Kleen to dispose of the waste in a California toxic waste dump near the Latino community of Westmoreland.

March 25, 1999: Environmental groups in California including GreenAction and around the world join BAN in denouncing the planned import of the toxic waste into California.

March 30, 1999: California Senators join community groups in protesting the planned importation of the FPG waste into the state of California. The EPA then denies Safety-Kleen a permit to import the waste. And the shipment of waste for California is rerouted back to Taiwan. BAN and the Coalition claim victory.

April 9, 1999: The FPG waste arrives back in Taiwan and is stored in its sea-going containers at Kaohsiung port. FPG is given a temporary permit to hold the waste. They subsequently receive 5 extensions to this permit while they attempt to re-export the waste to other communities.

May 8, 1999: A plan to ship the waste to a dumpsite in Nevada state is revealed to be contemplated by US firm US Ecology near Beatty, Nevada.

May 21, 1999: Nevada Senator Bryan calls the waste importation scheme misguided.

June 9, 1999: BAN and the Washington Toxics Coalition reveal and denounce a plan to ship the waste to an Idaho Envirosafe dumpite via Puget Sound area Washington ports. They call on the EPA to deny the import permit.

June 17, 1999: A Cambodia court convicted 2 men of illegally importing the FPG waste. They are sentenced to 5 years in jail. Two more Taiwanese men are convicted in absentia to the same penalty.

July 8, 1999: Two human rights workers go on trial in Cambodia. for their alleged involvement in the protests and riots following the FPG waste importation. The detention and trial is condemned by international human rights organizations.

July 21, 1999: Human rights workers arrested and held without bail in January are finally aquitted and released.

July 22, 1999: Coalition of labor and environmental groups halt shipment of waste to Envirosafe dumpsite in Idaho via the port of Tacoma. Longshoremen come to the aid of BAN and Washington Toxics Coalition as they fail to convince the US Environmental Protection Agency regional office in Seattle to deny an import permit. Just as shipment of waste is about to be loaded onto a ship to take it to Tacoma, longshoremen place phone call to their counterparts in Taiwan and the waste is offloaded.

July 23, 1999: Envirosafe announces they are no longer seeking to import the FPG waste into Idaho.

September 19, 1999: Residents and officials of the Jenwu township protest strongly against the FPG plan to import the waste to the FPG factory nearby.

September 21, 1999: FPG reveals that they are negotiating with France to accept the mercury contaminated waste. They stated that an import permit by France had already been granted and that money had already been exchanged.

September 30, 1999: BAN and Frence affiliate group CNIID denounce the plan to import the FPG waste to France.

November 8, 1999: France says no. The local French community, angered by a permit granted by government authorities to import toxic waste without informing their advisory committee are successful in getting France to reverse its decision to allow the importation. FPG next tries to export to BRZ company in Germany. The government asks Greenpeace if they will object. Greenpeace says yes. Government then denies the permit.

January 23, 2000: FPG finally announces they will keep the waste at home. Later they were discovered to still be negotiating with US and European firms to export it.

March 3, 2000: It is discovered that in December of 1999, FPG sent 32 containers of the crushed barrels and protective clothing used in the clean-up to the AVR incinerator in Rotterdam. Environmentalists in Netherlands and in Taiwan are furious that they had not been informed by authorities.

March 10, 2000: GreenAction discovers and denounces renewed plans by FPG and US Ecology to dispose of the waste in Nevada, this time by bringing the waste in through the seldom used port of Coos Bay, Oregon to avoid protests.

March 20, 2000: Oregon governor denounces the plan to use Oregon ports to transfer Asian toxic waste to Nevada. Following another eruption of adverse public reaction, U.S. Ecology finally withdraws its most recent plans.

June 4, 2000: FPG announces final? settlement with Jenwu township and compensate residents around 500,000 dollars US to accept that the waste will be processed near their community.

The End?


FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The Basel Action Network is making this article available in our efforts to advance understanding of ecological sustainability and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a `fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond `fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
More News